|
Novello, 1956
Vanbrugh
Quartet
(1998, CD     )
Maggini
Quartet
(1997, CD     )
At
Moeran.com
At
Amazon.co.uk

|
String Quartet No. 2 in
E Flat R98
Allegro moderato
Lento
There
is considerable dispute about whether
or not this delightful piece is Moeran's 2nd String Quartet, or
actually predates the first. Geoffrey Self devotes an appendix in
his book to arguing the later date, while Barry Marsh here offers
a similar conclusion.
However, Rhoderick McNeill
(below) offers a powerful argument for the original conclusion,
that it is in fact an early work. Of the two recordings, Naxos avoid
the numbering issue, while ASV call it number 2, while their sleevenotes
plump for the 'early date' theory.
With this in mind I intend to stick with calling this
the Second String Quartet, even though it may predate the First.
The manuscript of this quartet was found among Moeran's
papers in 1950. It is undated, but by the nature of its style, in
Geoffrey Self's observation, "simple, innocent and childlike", dismissed
by some commentators as an early work. Yet the two movements share
similarity of form with the 1946 Fantasy
Quartet.
It is now thought that this work came to be written
in order to offset certain tensions that were beginning to arise
in the composer's life from 1947 onwards. The desire to make great
music together with his wife Peers Coetmore had produced the stark
individuality of the Cello Sonata,
but it had also turned composing into an obligation. The Second
Quartet is, by contrast, Moeran in relaxed mood and telling us how
to enjoy ourselves - inconsistently at times, perhaps, but never
worth our neglect. here is accessible music, honest, direct, and
written by a man who, as a sting player himself, was often happiest
in this medium, and at peace in his beloved Ireland.
A Celtic atmosphere pervades the second movement in
particular, where echoes of Kerry songs, both serene and lively,
call to mind similar passages from the Second
Symphony - also in E flat - on which Moeran was working at the
time of his death.
By Rhoderick McNeill,
University of Southern Queensland, Australia
In my thesis entitled "A Critical Study of the
Life and Works of E.J.Moeran" (University of Melbourne 1982),
I argued for an early date for this quartet - in fact I placed it
roughly in the period 1918-20. As I was living and working
in Indonesia for 10 years between 1985-95 I did not get hold of
Geoffrey Self's book until the early 90s. Personally, I cannot agree
with Self's conclusion about the date of the E flat quartet.
Here are some reasons:
1. An early article introducing Moeran's music ('Newcomers
- E.J. Moeran', The Chesterian, No.36, 1923, p.124) mentions three
string quartets predating the published String
Quartet in A Minor, and two Violin Sonatas predating the Sonata
of 1922, as well as hinting at other chamber works. In the same
article Moeran is said to consider them worthless and to have withheld
them from public performance. Another reference to these chamber
works was made in the program notes for the 1924 Norwich Triennial
Festival, at which the premiere of Moeran's Rhapsody
No.2 was given. This is a clear indication that Moeran had given
significant time to the medium. It makes sense that, as a young
composer, Moeran would publish the one he considered the strongest,
namely the A minor. As a composer whose style was rapidly developing
between 1920-24, it is not surprising that he would hold back a
work in a simpler style, given the limited chances one has as an
emerging composer for publication.
2. The harmonic idiom of the work is essentially triadic
- the use of ninths, elevenths and thirteenths which one finds in
Moeran's work from the First
Rhapsody and Violin Sonata onwards is largely absent. However,
it is also not as complex harmonically as either In
the Mountain Country (which bears an Irish sub-title on the
MS score in the Victorian College of the Arts collection, incidentally
cf. Point 4 below) or the A minor quartet of 1921, which are not
as dissonant, in turn as the works of 1922 and 23. Generally, I
see a link harmonically with the idiom of the three early piano
pieces (ie. At a Horse Fair). Although Moeran often included
diatonic sections in his later works (ie second subject group of
the G minor symphony first
movement, first episode
in the Rondo of Violin
Concerto and slow movement of the Cello
Concerto), these were almost never sustained for long periods,
let alone a whole work. The E flat quartet shows little of Moeran's
tendency towards more linear counterpoint which we find post 1929
(Sonata for Two Violins, String
Trio) or the bitonal episodes which occur in his later works.
Nor yet do we hear strong echoes of Delius. Rather, I hear connections
with Vaughan Williams's pre-1914 style. Take for instance the opening
three part writing of 'Is my team ploughing' from On Wenlock Edge
and compare with that ghostly Andante section (figure 29) in the
E flat quartet, second movement.
3. The Fantasy form of the second movement, incorporating
elements of slow movement, scherzo and coda, was especially popular
during the second decade of the 20th century - ie works of Bridge,
Ireland, Vaughan Williams and Howells. Sure, there are later works
using this form - by Britten, and, of course, Moeran. However, in
the Moeran case, the 1946 style seems quite different to the E flat
quartet.
4. Moeran had already spent time in Ireland towards
the end of his military service. One of his sketch books in the
Victorian College of the Arts collection includes a folk tune collected
in Western Ireland in 1919, replete with the repeated three note
figure which ends the beautiful main melody of the slow section
in the E flat quartet, 2nd movement. As well, Moeran found a number
of variants of Irish tunes in Norfolk (E.J. Moeran: 'Some Folksinging
of Today', English Folk Dance and Song Society Journal, Vol.5, No.3,
1948. This could explain the Irish feel to the second movement.
|
"Moeran in relaxed mood and telling
us how to enjoy ourselves"
|